The NYT Says Something Nice About Westminster!
Westminster used to be a really big deal for the New York Times. However, in recent years–as I’ve frequently mentioned–their coverage has dwindled to a few condescending/derisive soundbites that make me wish they’d ignore it completely.
So, I wasn’t quite sure what to make of this belated full-page color graphic in the March 8 Arts section. Why run it two weeks after the show, and why in the Arts section? I haven’t a clue about that, but I was pleasantly surprised by the uncharacteristic, positive tone of the piece.
Yes, it’s more of an impressionistic cartoon, but the breeds were properly identified and favorably presented. It was mainly snap shots of backstage, last-minute ring prep. Maybe it’s not a new angle for dog show reporting, but in the hands of mainstream sources it has become predictably trite and derogatory. So, this was a refreshing change from that anti-purebred ideology which has commandeered most reporting on the show.
Albeit, the article was superficial, but it was also upbeat, curious, and genuinely appreciative of what goes on behind the scenes.
For instance, contrary to the consistently biased portrayal of show dogs as silent sufferers, this piece depicted them as snoozing on their grooming tables oblivious to the throngs of adoring fans jostling for a peek or a photo.
It also focused on some relatable details like the humorous coincidence of both the agility winning Border Collie and an American Hairless Terrier sharing the name “Pink”.
One drawing showed an English Setter getting its feet chalked, another explained Spaniel ear wraps. Quotes from a couple of spectators conveyed the fun of the event, and even though the illustrations definitely fell well within the definition of cartoons, they were pretty spot-on in terms of breed specific details. All in all, it was a nice change of pace.
You can probably find it online if you’re interested in taking a look for yourself.
Short URL: https://caninechronicle.com/?p=180525
Comments are closed