Do you have something to say? If so, feel free to
write us with your thoughts and opinions on any recent article.
If we find it of interest to our readers, we'll print it. Be sure
that you include your name, address and a phone number or email
address so that we may contact you. You may make your submission
by mail, fax or email.
Differing Emphasis :; Sept article
Hi Dr. Morgan-Jones,
I read with interest your article in the September
on-line Canine Chronicle. The question you pose - "would you give preference
to a well-made dog with average breed type or to an unsound, poorly-constructed
dog excelling in one type characteristic or other?" - is one
I have been debating with my friends in both my breeds - Rottweilers
and Scottish Terriers - for years!
I think part of the quandry comes from the fact that many of our
judges - all arounders and breeder judges - are coming from the
ranks of handlers. While not totally a bad thing, very, very
few of them have done anything with their dogs besides go around
the show ring. How many of them have seen a great terrier
go to ground and take out a nasty varmint or seen a powerful Rottweiler
take down a "bad guy" in the protection work of Schutzhund or
effortlessly be able to work 80 or 90 sheep quietly and efficiently all
day then go home, get a bath and go pull the kids' cart in the
town's parade? To me, "pretty is as pretty does"!
My current Scottie is a champion but one of the things
he is criticized for is a "coarse" jaw. I put my
hands on some of the show Scotties today and wonder, with that
narrow, narrow head, how in the world they would kill a varmint
with no bone for the muscle in their jaw to attach to much less
get down a 9" hole due to their size!
In Rotties, the current fad for the sloping rear and
corresponding rear weakness makes me shudder to think
of them trying to do any work at all!
Fortunately, there are still enough judges that appreciate a "working" structure
but how do we educate those that have never actually needed a dog
to do the work it was developed to do and found out first hand
when the mind is willing but the body weak?
You will see one of my "all arounder" dogs in the next
issue of Canine Chronicle in an article that is going to be about
Dual Champions!
Janet Noble
Buster, Bandit, Abby and Bugs
McGruff, Abbo, Usco, Toby and Bryce (RB)
Tacoma, WA USA
Lessons to be Learned article
Good morning,
I just read the article “Lessons To Be Learned” by
Gay Dunlap on your website and it is fabulous. I just hope it was
published elsewhere for as many people as possible to see. Did
you send a copy to the Jockey Club? Or perhaps to racing publications? They
all need a wake up call too!
I have been a dog breeder for 25+ years and am also an avid dressage
rider. I am vehemently opposed to horse racing as it is now with
racing horses at such a young age when their bones cannot take
the strain. We don’t start pushing our dressage horses until
they are five or six years old and they don’t reach their
peak until several years later and we can still show a dressage
horse into its late teens to early twenties! It always amazed me
that anyone would breed to a stallion that had broken down at a
young age and was put out to stud. What are these people thinking?
But to your point in breeders owning the responsibility…it
to our credit when good dogs/horses are bred and our entire fault
when bad dogs/horses are bred. When breeders blame ‘too many
dog shows or horse races’ they are just unwilling to look
in the mirror and accept the responsibility of their own bad decisions.
Breeding must always be an objective, researched decision and never
an emotional one. We must breed to meet our bitch’s or mare’s
needs not necessarily to the winning animal of the times. I have
personally ‘flushed’ stored frozen semen of a beautifully
structured dog when we realized there was most likely a genetic
heart problem. I have chosen not to breed other structurally beautiful
dogs when their temperaments weren’t as they should be…they
were not aggressive or ill mannered by any means, but not the outgoing,
happy, secure personality that should be typical of the breed.
We as breeders MUST accept the sole responsibility of breeding
quality dogs/horses and not put the blame on bad judges or too
many dog shows or horse races.
Thanks again for the wonderful article. Cackie Vroom
Cackie Vroom
Classic Sighthounds
Article by Gay Dunlap
This article was written beautifully....I would love to see drug
testing allowed in our Fancy of Dog Showing...specifically to growth
enhancement and in particular steroids , mood enhancers and female
testosterone CHEQUE drops given to bitches being specialed to maintain
coat and build muscle....this has been done for decades in bitches
and is disgusting and I was glad to listen to some very ethical
professional handlers remark that ....if their client wanted this
for their specials bitch...the bitch would not be shown by them
period...how refreshing and how sad that it is blatantly done in
the fancy....and will continue to be done with no control...bad
for the fancy of dog showing and bad for the dogs overall...but
the fancy has become SPORT....not the original intention of showing
dogs....Thanks for printing the article....now if only something
would be done about it.
Michele Mckinney
Churchil Bloodhounds since 1979
Tread Lightly
I have a male frenchie, he isn't a show dog
but he is the
light of my life! I read you wonderful summation after it
had been posted on the frogdoggers site. I just wanted to
tell you that your gift with words is astounding! I am so
glad you shared your history and wish I could have known
any of the dogs you mention. My Bodacious shares many of
the characteristics you brought up and you painted a glorious picture
of Frenchie love.
Thank you again for sharing.
Cheri
The Sonlit dogs...
I saw your article on the Sonlit dogs, and
I could not help but comment. I lost my 13 year old Hammer (Bullmarket Sumolebull
Pelshire, CD), a son of Pelshire's Sonlit Mario and grandson of
Sonlit's Daring Esprit, this March. His dam was LeBull's
Achey Breaky Heart, and Carol Gravestock of Bullmarket still owns
and adores his litter sister Tessa. Hammer was a dazzling
combination of physical strength and exquisite mental sensitivity
that I had never before experienced in a dog, and I have had dogs
all my life. He was very particular about the other dogs
in his life, hating most of them, but the ones he loved, he loved
with a fierce devotion. He loved me with that same fierce
devotion, and his passing has left a huge hole in my heart. I
have been told that I will never find that particular combination
of strength, ferocity, and sensitivity again, because it was from
the Sonlit side of the family tree, and all of those dogs are gone. So
many of the Frenchies that I have met since Hammer, and I have
met hundreds of them, are lumps of uninspired canine pudding, sweet
but rather dull minded.
I want to thank you for breeding the dogs that
made a dog like my Hammer possible...
Charlotte Creeley, Esq.
Canine Chronicle
Hiya,
I have just read your article on the internet and I have to say
that you are an extremely passionate and articulate writer who
epitomises the way I believe all breeders should [naturally] feel
about their dogs.
I know of your kennel name from doing Frenchie research on the
net and your dogs are truly fabulous. But the most compelling thing
I picked up on is the respect and admiration you have for your
canine family.
Thankyou so much for sharing and may God bless the show world with
more loyal 'doggie people' like yourself in future.
With a smile,
Caroline :~)
Caroline Roberts
Secretary Auckland Bulldog Club
Tread Lightly
I want to compliment you on this article, but
my words would seem so inadequate in comparison to what you have
written. Let
me just say - stunning - to the point and a dagger in the heart.
Bravo, etc.
Helene Neer
www.petitmotiffrenchies.com
|